Steelers’ Randy Fichtner strives to get James Conner more carries |

Steelers’ Randy Fichtner strives to get James Conner more carries

Chris Adamski
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers running back James Conner pulls in a two-point conversion past the Chiefs' Anthony Hitchens in the second quarter Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018 at Heinz Field.

Dating to the second half of the season opener at Cleveland, running back James Conner has amassed 104 rushing yards on 39 carries.

But because it’s taken three-plus games to get him those 39 carries, offensive coordinator Randy Fichtner is willing to take the blame for the lack of production.

“I probably just need to do a better job heating him up,” Fichtner said, referring to giving Conner more carries. “It’s just like quarterbacks, too. You get into a rhythm. And all good running backs, they need that rhythm.”

Conner has gotten fewer than 10 carries in two of the past three games, getting eight for 17 yards in Week 2 and nine for 19 yards Sunday.

There were six possessions Sunday in which Conner did not have a carry. He also was taken off the field at times in favor of Ryan Switzer, a slot receiver who lined up in the backfield.

Fichtner said none of it is meant as a slight toward Conner.

“He’s a tough, hard-nosed inside runner. He’s a capable outside runner,” Fichtner said. “He’s done a really fine job in protection and in routes, so he’s been very complete, if you will.”

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.