Steelers’ T.J. Watt named AFC Defensive Player of the Week |

Steelers’ T.J. Watt named AFC Defensive Player of the Week

Chris Adamski
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers lineback T.J. Watt celebrates his sack of Browns quarterback Tyrod Taylor in the third quarter Sunday, Sept. 9, 2018 at Firstenergy Stadium Cleveland Ohio.

After his NFL debut in Cleveland a year ago, T.J. Watt was honored as the NFL’s rookie of the week. For an encore in his 2018 debut on the same FirstEnergy Stadium field, Watt one-upped himself.

Watt was named AFC Defensive Player of the Week, the NFL announced Wednesday morning.

Even after the league later on Wednesday announced a scoring change that subtracted a sack off his bounty, Watt was credited with career highs of three sacks and 11 tackles in the Pittsburgh Steelers’ 21-21 tie against the Browns on Sunday. Watt also blocked the potential winning Cleveland field goal in the final seconds of overtime.

No Steelers player had recorded four sacks in a game since 2001; only one player (Chad Brown in 1996) has had more than four sacks in a game for the Steelers since the sack became an official statistic in 1992.

Almost exactly one year earlier, Watt had two sacks and an interception in the first game of his 2017 rookie season.

Watt is the first Steelers linebacker to be named a conference player of the week since Lawrence Timmons in 2010.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.