Steelers tasked with stopping NFL’s ‘second-best receiver,’ DeAndre Hopkins |

Steelers tasked with stopping NFL’s ‘second-best receiver,’ DeAndre Hopkins

Chris Adamski
Houston Texans wide receiver DeAndre Hopkins (10) makes a reception over Jacksonville Jaguars cornerback Jalen Ramsey (20) during the first half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Dec. 17, 2017, in Jacksonville, Fla.

In a nod to the Steelers’ Antonio Brown, defensive coordinator Keith Butler called DeAndre Hopkins “the second-best wide receiver in the league.”

Monday, Butler’s defense will be tasked with limiting Hopkins, who is second in the NFL to Brown in receiving yards but leads the league with 12 touchdown receptions. No player in the NFL is more targeted by passes than Hopkins (168), and according to NFL Next Gen Stats no player is responsible for a bigger share of his team’s targeted air yards than Hopkins (44.5 percent).

“He does a great job running routes,” Butler said, “and he does a great job combating for the catch. He is going to be a major problem for us to try and stop so we have a lot of respect for him. We have some things we are going to try to do to limit him as much as we can. I don’t think you can stop him. I think you just try to minimize him as much as you can. You’re not going to stop him.”

As for who, exactly, will be assigned with stopping Hopkins, Steelers cornerback Joe Haden said the team won’t veer from their typical defensive strategy of having a right outside cornerback (Artie Burns), a left outside cornerback (Haden) and a slot cornerback (Mike Hilton) to cover opposing receivers.

“So however (the Texans) do it, we’ll be ready,” Haden said. “I faced him a couple times in Cleveland. Super physical dude; we had some great battles… he’s a great player.”

Haden said he works out, at times, with Hopkins in the offseason.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.