Steelers valued at $2.585 billion, No. 15 in NFL in latest Forbes rankings |

Steelers valued at $2.585 billion, No. 15 in NFL in latest Forbes rankings

Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Fans cheer as Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger is introduced before the home opener against the Chiefs Sunday, Sept. 16, 2018, outside Heinz Field.

TAMPA, Fla. – The Pittsburgh Steelers may be mired in last place in the AFC North, but off the field they are on much more solid footing.

According to the NFL franchise valuations released last week by Forbes , the Steelers are near the middle of the league’s 32 teams, ranking No. 15 with a value of $2.585 billion.

The team’s value increased 5 percent from 2017 when the Steelers ranked No. 16 with a value of $2.45 billion.

According to Forbes, the Steelers had $415 million in revenue last year and $85 million in operating income.

Values across the NFL jumped just 2 percent from 2017, the smallest increase since 2011.

The Dallas Cowboys top the list with a value of $5 billion. The New England Patriots are second at $3.8 billion. Rounding out the top five are the New York Giants ($3.3 billion), Los Angeles Rams ($3.2 billion) and Washington Redskins ($3.1 billion).

The least valuable NFL franchise is the Buffalo Bills at $1.6 billion.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.