ShareThis Page
Tackling comes natural to Steelers’ 7th-round pick |

Tackling comes natural to Steelers’ 7th-round pick

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers' Tyler Matakevich works out during rookie minicamp Friday, May 6, 2016, at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Tyler Matakevich concedes he needs to brush up on his football history. He is not as familiar with the NFL’s iconic middle linebackers, such as Dick Butkus and Ray Nitschke, as he would like to be.

But does Matakevich, the Steelers’ second seventh-round pick last week, consider himself an old-school linebacker like them?

“Yes, sir,” he said soon after coming off the field after his first NFL practice Friday. “See the ball, go get the ball”

Matakevich drew the most media attention of the 54 players who were available after the first workout of Day 1 of the Steelers three-day rookie camp at the UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

That’s not typical for a seventh-round pick, but Matakevich is no typical seventh-round pick.

Matakevich is coming off a season in which he swept college football’s major awards recognizing the nation’s top defensive player (the Chuck Bednarik and Bronko Nagurski awards), and he was the soul of a Temple team that arguably was the best in the program’s history.

So why wasn’t Matakevich drafted higher than 246th overall, just seven spots removed from the infamous Mr. Irrelevant?

“Nowadays, everyone is always worried about the size and the (combine) numbers,” Matakevich said.

Those aren’t kind to Matakevich: 6-feet tall, 238 pounds, 4.81 seconds in the 40-yard dash, 7.19 in the three-cone drill, 4.5 in the 20-yard shuttle, 112 inches in the broad jump and 31 inches in the vertical jump.

‌• Only five of 31 linebackers who ran the 40 did so in a slower time than Matakevich.

‌• Only four of 16 linebackers who ran the three-cone drill did so in a slower time than Matakevich.

‌• Only five of 20 linebackers who ran the 20-yard shuttle did so in a slower time than Matakevich.

‌• Only four of 32 linebackers had a worse broad jump than Matakevich.

‌• Only eight of 32 linebackers had a worse vertical jump than Matakevich.

Luckily for Matakevich, the Steelers have expressed a desire to look more at college production than in measurables.

Coach Mike Tomlin met Matakevich at the Senior Bowl. After the draft, he termed it “football justice” that a too-small, too-slow but highly-accomplished college player gets drafted.

“I just think he saw (the film), and he knows who I am as a person,” Matakevich said. “I just said, ‘The numbers aren’t great, but I’m all over the field when you turn on the film.’ ”

Besides, Matakevich’s tumble down the draft board closely resembles the recruiting process he endured out of high school. Temple was the lone FBS scholarship offer of consequence.

Four years of tackles being racked up later, the Owls were rewarded.

“Tyler is a special player,” Temple coach Matt Rhule said. “He will play in the NFL for many years and will make the Steelers very happy. He gets credit for being a playmaker and being very instinctual, but what people don’t see is that he spends a lot of time studying film. He’s a football junkie, and he will fit right in in Pittsburgh.”

While Matakevich believes his fit is “perfect” at inside linebacker in the Steelers’ scheme, that likely won’t be where he will make his first impact. That almost assuredly will come on special teams, where Matakevich played for four college seasons.

“I know that’s going to be a way for me to get on the field,” Matakevich said, “and that’s something I look forward to doing.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.