The day after: 5 things that stood out from Steelers’ win over Vikings |

The day after: 5 things that stood out from Steelers’ win over Vikings

Joe Rutter

Five things we learned from Steelers 26, Vikings 9.

1. The Steelers truly haven’t been tested and might not be until they travel to Baltimore for Week 4.

They beat the Browns who were starting a rookie quarterback and they beat the Vikings who were starting a backup.

Everyone expected the Browns to be bad, and they have played true to form. The Vikings looked good in Week 1, but showed they can’t compete with a backup quarterback under center. Now comes the 0-2 Chicago Bears, another team with quarterback issues. Journeyman Mike Glennon had three first-half turnovers, including a pick six, in a 29-7 loss to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. For now, coach John Fox is sticking with Glennon and not benching him in favor of No. 2 overall pick Mitchell Trubisky.

To show they are serious about claiming the top seed in the AFC, the Steelers must avoid a repeat of last season when they started 2-0 but were thumped, 34-3, in Philadelphia. A 3-0 start would be a first for the Steelers since 2010, which led to their most recent appearance in the Super Bowl.

2. Cam Heyward doesn’t need Stephon Tuitt to be unstoppable.

Heyward was the unquestioned star –- on offense or defense -– in the 26-9 win. He set the tone with six tackles, including one for a loss in the first half, as the Steelers jumped to a 14-3 lead. He added two quarterback pressures in the second half in his first game at Heinz Field since he tore his pectoral muscle in a loss to Dallas last November.

The Steelers showed they could weather the loss of Heyward for the second half of 2016. This year, Heyward is showing they can withstand the loss of Tuitt, who probably could benefit from another week to rest his injured left biceps muscle.

3. The Steelers haven’t cornered the market on needless penalties.

One week after committing four unnecessary roughness penalties against Cleveland, nobody was guilty of a late hit or shot to the head against the Vikings. True, the Steelers were flagged 10 times, but that was one fewer than the Vikings, who at times resembled the football version of the Bad News Bears. Like the baseball equivalent of the fake-to-third, throw-to-first pickoff move, the Steelers tried the good ol’ draw-’em-offsides play on fourth-and-short that never works. Except this time it did, as defensive Brian Robison flinched and guaranteed the Steelers a first down on a drive that led to their first touchdown.

The Vikings also tried a fake punt on the first drive of the third quarter, with Ryan Quigley floating the ball long enough for Tyler Matakevich to cover the tight end and bat it away. The Steelers were able to take advantage of those penalties, plus two pass interference calls, to score 17 points.

4. JuJu Smith-Schuster is quickly endearing himself as a hard-hitting receiver.

It wasn’t the 4-yard touchdown catch on his first NFL reception that stood out in Smith-Schuster’s second career game. Rather, it was the block that leveled Vikings safety Harrison Smith.

Smith-Schuster put Smith on his back while blocking for Le’Veon Bell on a running play. It was reminiscent of the type of blocks Hines Ward used to put on defenders.

Smith-Schuster’s physicality is one of the traits that attracted him to the Steelers, and he has not disappointed at this point of his young career. Now, if only Smith-Schuster could do something about eliminating those penalties. He had a false start in the fourth quarter, running his penalty total in two games to three. That equals his number of career NFL receptions.

5 The Steelers are lucky to have Chris Boswell.

A long-term contract for their kicker didn’t happen before the season started, but the Steelers would be wise to lock up Boswell as soon as possible once the calendar flips to 2018. His stock continued to rise with four field goals against the Vikings, the 12 points accounting for all of the Steelers’ scoring in the second half.

Even when Boswell missed, he really didn’t. After his 51-yard attempt in the third quarter sailed wide left, Boswell got another chance courtesy of the Vikings having an illegal formation. Given the second chance, he put the ball through the uprights from 46 yards for a 17-3 lead.

Boswell also had five touchbacks on his seven kickoffs. The two times the Vikings did bring the ball out of the end zone, they started drives at the 18 and 17.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster picks up a first down past the Vikings' Trae Waynes during the fourth quarter Sunday, Sept. 17, 2017, at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers' Cam Heyward pressures Vikings quarterback Case Keenum in the third quarter Sunday, Sept. 17, 2017 at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver Martavis Bryant beats the Vikings' Trae Waynes in the third quarter Sunday, Sept. 17, 2017 at Heinz Field.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers kicker Chris Boswell kicks a 29-yard field goal during the third quarter against the Vikings Sunday, Sept. 17, 2017, at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers defensive end Cameron Heyward chases Vikings quarterback Case Keenum Sunday, Sept. 17, 2017 at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers wide receiver Martavis Bryant breaks a tackle to score in the first quarter against the Minnesota Vikings on Sept. 17, 2017 at Heinz Field.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver Martavis Bryant scores past the Vikings' Andrew Sendejo during the first quarter Sunday, Sept. 17, 2017, at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver Martavis Bryant beats the Vikings' Trae Waynes in the third quarter Sunday, Sept. 17, 2017 at Heinz Field.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.