Archive

ShareThis Page
Triceps injury leaves Steelers DE Keisel’s future uncertain | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Triceps injury leaves Steelers DE Keisel’s future uncertain

Tribune-Review
| Sunday, November 30, 2014 6:45 p.m.

The Steelers’ longest-tenured player might have played his final game.

Defensive end Brett Keisel left Sunday’s loss to the New Orleans Saints with an injury to his left triceps. Keisel’s locker was empty after the game, and he was unavailable.

Coach Mike Tomlin said Keisel would be evaluated. Tomlin said he would provide an update Tuesday.

Keisel was in obvious pain as he left the field late in the third quarter. He soon was declared out for the game.

“You don’t want to see anyone get hurt, especially something like that where he won’t be back for the rest of the season,” linebacker James Harrison said. “So it’s hard.”

Keisel, 36, was selected by the Steelers in the seventh round of the 2002 draft. He has appeared in 156 games, including all 12 this season after signing late in training camp. When healthy, Keisel started every game he appeared in for the Steelers from 2006-13. Sunday was his fourth start of 2014.

The painful nature of Keisel’s injury reminded some Steelers of another respected veteran defensive end, Aaron Smith, who missed the final 10 games of the 2010 season because of a torn left triceps.

“For me, personally, when I saw (Keisel leave the field), of course I was really disappointed. I’ve seen it happen with Aaron,” said safety Troy Polamalu, who is tied with cornerback Ike Taylor for the Steelers’ second-longest active continuous tenure.

“There’s very few guys left here in the locker room that you’ve experienced a lot with, ups and downs, that you can carry through with them. I’m definitely going to miss Brett and his leadership.”

— Chris Adamski

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.