Archive

ShareThis Page
Was Steelers’ James Conner throwing shade at Le’Veon Bell with TD celebration? | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

Was Steelers’ James Conner throwing shade at Le’Veon Bell with TD celebration?

Tribune-Review
| Sunday, September 9, 2018 3:21 p.m
213609gtrsteelers11091018
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers running back James Conner celebrates his touchdown against the Browns in the second quarter Sunday, Sept. 9, 2018 at Firstenergy Stadium Cleveland Ohio.
213609gtrsteelers05091018
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers celebrate James Conner's touchdown against the Browns in the second quarter Sunday, Sept. 9, 2018 at Firstenergy Stadium Cleveland Ohio.

James Conner had 56 touchdowns during his career at Pitt. He got his first in the NFL on Sunday.

Conner ran through a wide hole the offensive line created for him on the right side of the offense 3 minutes and 41 seconds into the second quarter of the Pittsburgh Steelers’ regular-season opener at the Cleveland Browns.

A second-year NFL running back who was a third-round pick last season, Conner made his first NFL start in the game as a replacement for the absent Le’Veon Bell.

After the score, Conner showed a child-like enthusiasm in scoring for the first time in a meaningful game since Nov. 26, 2016, while playing for Pitt against Syracuse.

Popular at Pitt because he was a two-time all-ACC performer and because he overcame Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in 2015-16. Many reacted to his touchdown on Twitter:

Of course, many fans took the no-frills celebration – showing love for his linemen – as a subtle shot at Bell, who has not signed his $14.5 million franchise tag tender and has not reported to the Steelers. Wednesday, three Steelers offensive linemen were critical of Bell’s absence .

Conner scored his second NFL touchdown later in the game.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.