Archive

ShareThis Page
What was Le’Veon Bell saying with his tweet after Steelers tied Browns? | TribLIVE.com
Steelers/NFL

What was Le’Veon Bell saying with his tweet after Steelers tied Browns?

Tribune-Review
| Sunday, September 9, 2018 7:18 p.m
214029gtrsteelerstexans03122617
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
214029leveonbell
This is a photo of Le'Veon Bell of the Pittsburgh Steelers NFL football team. This image reflects the Pittsburgh Steelers active roster as of Monday, June 18, 2018. (AP Photo)

Of all the players who have a locker stall at the Pittsburgh Steelers’ UPMC Rooney Sports Complex practice facility, Le’Veon Bell perhaps was the only one who stayed dry Sunday afternoon.

Like most of the rest of Steelers Nation, Bell likely watched the Steelers’ four-hour 21-21 tie with the Cleveland Browns from his couch (or at least some other dry locale). And the only commentary the star running back had during or after the game on Twitter was a one-character emoji.

It was sent to express wonderment over the fact an NFL game can end in a tie. After all, the Steelers hadn’t been in one since 2002, and the most recent time the Browns had tied a game was 29 years ago.

During the 70 minutes of action in the game, Bell’s replacement had 192 yards from scrimmage and two touchdowns. Of course, among James Conner’s 36 touches was a crucial fumble, too.

As such — and with many fans bitter toward Bell for not signing his franchise player tag and forfeiting $855,000 each week he chooses not to report to the Steelers — many fans expressed opinions about Bell and/or Conner during and after the game.

Some fans apparently even took Bell’s tweet as a veiled shot at Conner or the Steelers or his whole contract situation.

Bell, though, made sure to clarify that it was not.

Hey, Steeler Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.