Archive

ShareThis Page
James Harrison suggests Steelers RB Le’Veon Bell should fake injury upon return | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

James Harrison suggests Steelers RB Le’Veon Bell should fake injury upon return

Tim Benz
| Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:27 a.m
PatriotsHarrisonFootball03684jpg0837a
James Harrison arrives at Heinz Field for a game against the New England Patriots earlier this season. The Patriots signed Harrison Tuesday after he was released Saturday by the Steelers.

We’ve made it all the way to Wednesday of a game week — Ravens week, no less — and no one on the Pittsburgh Steelers has said or done anything stupid.

That’s a new record for this club.

But fear not! We can rely on a former Steeler to come through for us in a pinch.

Oh, and a former Raven, too.

James Harrison went on the FS1 “Undisputed” show. He endorses the idea of Le’Veon Bell signing his franchise tag at the last possible moment, then faking an injury.

And host Shannon Sharpe cosigns on the idea.

Yup. That’s Harrison. The guy who personified blood-and-guts, tough-guy football in Pittsburgh for years, saying out loud that Bell should fake an injury.

It’s nothing that those of us in the media haven’t pontificated. It’s always been one of the eight million possibilities out there for how this twisted melodrama could play out. But it seems to carry more weight when you actually hear a former Steelers great endorse that as a strategy.

And it’s disheartening.

Now, if Harrison said, “Le’Veon, just sign the tag and start falling asleep and snoring in meetings,” that I would’ve expected. Harrison did precisely that last year.

Keep watching the video after that, too. Listen to Sharpe and Harrison bloviate by saying, “let him go.”

Yeah, right, boys. Just rescind the tag, Kevin Colbert! Let poor Bell become a free agent now so he can sign a deal elsewhere this season.

Why? How does that strategy help the Steelers at all? So Bell can play against you later in the year once he works himself into shape? So he can become a Patriot like you did, Harrison?

Please. It’s just the latest example of former players going on camera and not understanding how this process works. Or it’s simply them thinking that the player should get what they want all the time in a contract dispute.

At some point, yes, Bell is going to wear another uniform and line up against the Steelers. But it doesn’t have to be this year. And the Steelers should use that angle to their advantage. It’s why the owners bargained for it in the collective bargaining agreement.

Get over it, fellas. You sound like naive, big babies here. You are crying on behalf of the player who is attempting to pull a power play. Bell is using every club in his bag to leverage his position against the Steelers.

The Steelers are doing the same thing to him. And preventing him from hitting free agency for as long as possible — in other words, through this year — is a card they can play.

Don’t like it? Then your union shouldn’t have agreed to the terms of the franchise tag in the CBA. I wouldn’t expect two great minds like Sharpe and Harrison to grasp that, though.

Harrison and Sharpe are faking being broadcasters. It shouldn’t surprise us that they are telling Bell to fake an injury.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.