Penguins’ Tristan Jarry, Pirates’ Pablo Reyes compete for catch of the night |
Breakfast With Benz

Penguins’ Tristan Jarry, Pirates’ Pablo Reyes compete for catch of the night

Tim Benz
Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Tristan Jarry (35) stops a shot against Detroit Red Wings left wing Justin Abdelkader (8) during the third period of an NHL preseason hockey game, Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2018, in Detroit. The Red Wings defeated the Penguins 3-2. (AP Photo/Duane Burleson)

Let’s play a little game of “who wore it better?”

Both candidates are from Pittsburgh. Both stylishly flashed a glove on their left hand.

Our first contestant is Penguins goaltender Tristan Jarry. Killing a penalty, up 1-0 on the road against the Red Wings during Wednesday’s preseason game, Jarry made this stellar save on Anthony Mantha.

Not only was Jarry sound on that save, he was excellent between the pipes all night. Jarry stopped 41 of 44 shots before losing 3-2 in overtime.

His opponent today is Pirates rookie Pablo Reyes. Leading off the third inning against Chris Archer, Kansas City’s Whit Merrifield ripped a line drive into right field. It was sinking fast. And Reyes, playing yet another position, made a tremendous diving catch.

Check out how he manages to read the angle instantly and position his glove under the quickly sinking ball to make the catch.

Reyes has been nothing but good. He doesn’t look lost at any of the numerous positions which he has played. He’s hitting well, too, with an average of .423.

So who wore it better? I say it’s Reyes by an eyelash. Jarry’s glove was true, but Mantha helped by picking his spot right in the center of it. Reyes completely stole that hit. And if the ball gets by him there, it may go for a triple.

So which catch was better?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.