Podcast: Tim Benz, Kevin Gorman on what could go wrong for Steelers in Week 1 |
Breakfast With Benz

Podcast: Tim Benz, Kevin Gorman on what could go wrong for Steelers in Week 1

Tim Benz
Pittsburgh Steelers running back James Conner (30) is hit by Tennessee Titans defensive end Julius Warmsley in the first half of an NFL preseason football game, Saturday, Aug. 25, 2018, in Pittsburgh. (AP Photo/Don Wright)

If you saw the Cleveland Browns on “Hard Knocks” this summer, then you know the Pittsburgh Steelers aren’t alone when it comes to drama.

Oh, the fun that may come out from this opening week matchup in Cleveland!

Not only is Ben Roethlisberger going to be on the other sideline across the field from Todd Haley, but also Bruce Arians is going to be calling the game on TV and it is going to be Randy Fichtner’s debut as the new offensive coordinator in Pittsburgh.

Meow! Hiss!

Then there’s the storyline of Le’Veon Bell’s continued absence and what that will mean for the team, especially if James Conner plays well.

LISTEN: Tim Benz and Kevin Gorman discuss Sunday’s season opener

Furthermore, what if Ben Roethlisberger gets hurt and new second-string quarterback Josh Dobbs is immediately pressed into service?

Buckle up for the opening ride of the 2018 NFL season. Trib columnist Kevin Gorman and I talk about everything that could come off the rails in Ohio on Sunday.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH. All tweets are subject for reposting. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.