ShareThis Page
Tim Benz: 4 simple thoughts on Steelers’ win over Bucs |
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: 4 simple thoughts on Steelers’ win over Bucs

Tim Benz
Julio Aguilar/Getty Images
Joe Haden reacts after a third-down stand against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Sept. 24, 2018 at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Fla.
Getty Images
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger gets some protection from offensive tackle Alejandro Villanueva as he throws to an open receiver during the second quarter against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Sept. 24, 2018 at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Fla.

The Steelers offense did everything it could to win in the first half. The Steelers defense did everything it could to keep it close in the second half. The Steelers special teams did everything they could to give it away throughout the game.

And the officials did everything they could to make themselves the story.

That’s the quickest way to sum up the Steelers 30-27 victory in Tampa. Honestly, those four thoughts tell the story. Yet so much more happened below the surface, it’d be doing the game an injustice to leave the analysis at that.

I’d also be coming up woefully short of my word count. So let’s expand, shall we?


Ben Roethlisberger and Co. got off to their typical horrid start, with a three-and-out followed by an interception. From there, it was a very good performance, especially considering that the offensive line was blocking without Marcus Gilbert and David DeCastro. B.J. Finney and Matt Feiler were part of an offense that totaled 413 yards and three touchdowns.

The Steelers should’ve been up 34-27 in the waning minutes. But Chris Boswell’s two missed kicks prevented that from happening.

More on that later.

Roethlisberger rebounded from that rocky start to be excellent the rest of the way. Of his last 33 passes, Big Ben completed 28 of them, including three touchdowns. None of his attempts were better than this one to JuJu Smith-Schuster late in the fourth quarter to effectively seal the game.

Vance McDonald’s stiff arm during this touchdown run while down 7-0 might have been the play to turn around the season.

Chris Conte was the one who got shoved down there. He’d later leave the game with an injured knee. I didn’t realize your pride was located in your knee.

Aside from McDonald, Smith-Schuster was great again. He popped off for 119 yards on five catches. He’s up to 27 receptions for 356 yards. That’s good for fourth in the league in catches and third behind New Orleans’ Michael Thomas and Tampa Bay’s Mike Evans in yardage.

James Conner was over 4 yards per carry at 15 for 61. He should’ve gotten the ball more on the Steelers first two drives of the fourth quarter. However, it’s clear the Steelers don’t trust him late in games yet as they did Le’Veon Bell.


The defense was huge early, accounting for turnovers on four straight possessions including a pick-6 from Bud Dupree.

But just as it looked like Buccaneers quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick was turning from “Fitzmagic” into “Fitztragic,” the Steelers let the Bucs off the mat. A 20-point halftime lead was whittled down to a field goal with Tampa getting the ball back at the 3:02 mark of the fourth quarter.

Suddenly, the Steelers found themselves unable to get off the field, allowing Fitzpatrick to rattle off 35 snaps en route to scoring drives on the team’s first three possessions of the second half. Meanwhile, the Steelers defense dropped a few chances at more Fitzpatrick interceptions.

In the end, though, the unit got off the field on a crucial third down before the two-minute warning, winning a key possession like the offense did late in the game.

Special teams

The Steelers’ special teams are a train wreck. There is no nice way to put it, nor should we look for one.

• The suddenly inept Chris Boswell missed an extra point and a field goal.

• They allowed a DeSean Jackson punt return for a score, but it was called back on a penalty.

• Danny Smith’s unit committed six penalties. They’ve been slapped for 12 on the season, for 130 yards.

That special teams’ penalty yardage total exceeds the entire penalty yardage total of the Patriots, Giants and Chargers.

The officials

Speaking of the officials, it was a Pete Morelli crew. So we knew disaster was looming. Pete and his pals got their much desired “Monday Night Football” face time, calling 26 penalties. Twenty-two of those flags were accepted.

Four of those flags were for illegal hits on the quarterback. It’s an awful rule, but the officials are still calling it too willingly.

For a moment, forget the dumb language regarding these borderline, ticky-tack, weak roughing-the-passer flags. If it’s a”judgment call” and the official’s “judgment” is that a flag wasn’t worthy, what’s the discipline against him if he doesn’t throw a flag?

And why is there discipline in the first place?

In other words, I’m asking, “So what if the officials ate a few of these 50-50 calls?” Because it is clear to me these officials are feeling extra motivated, encouraged and inspired to make those calls even if the quarterback was never at risk of injury.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.