ShareThis Page
Tim Benz: Le’Veon Bell’s final Steelers season already mirroring those of Bonds, Jagr |
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Le’Veon Bell’s final Steelers season already mirroring those of Bonds, Jagr

Tim Benz
| Thursday, August 9, 2018 6:30 a.m
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
One thing has become clear, whenever the 2018 season ends, Le'Veon Bell will be done in Pittsburgh. If the Steelers couldn’t meet his demands the past two springs, they won’t be able to do so once the bidding for his services hits the open market.

The Steelers have a game tonight. Le’Veon Bell won’t be playing in it. He won’t be playing in the next three either.

And who knows, maybe beyond. That’d be stupid of him to miss regular-season paychecks. But with the way this guy has handled himself over the past two offseasons, I put nothing past him.

Hey, he’s left millions in guaranteed money on the table. What’s another $856,000 per week, right?

One thing has become clear, whenever the 2018 season ends, Bell will be done in Pittsburgh. If the Steelers couldn’t meet his demands the past two springs, they won’t be able to do so once the bidding for his services hits the open market.

And the team surely won’t give him $20.9 million for a third-consecutive franchise tag.

So, that’ll be it.

It’s as clear now as it will be in the winter. It’s as obvious a swan song as it was for James Harrison last year. For Barry Bonds in 1992. For Jaromir Jagr in 2001.

All MVPs. All Pittsburgh sports heros. All exited in bitter divorces.

Harrison was cut after forcing his way out of town by allegedly leaving the sidelines early from games and sleeping in meetings. Then he signed with the hated Patriots. Jagr pouted through his last year, requesting a trade and publicly arguing with his coach Ivan Hlinka. Bonds suggested Pittsburgh fans were racist for their treatment of former teammate Bobby Bonilla . And his agent blew off any chance of Bonds staying long before spring training started.

The cases of Jagr and Bonds are very similar to Bell’s. Unlike Harrison, those two were still in their prime in their respective final Pittsburgh seasons, and their teams were highly competitive. Bonds won the MVP as the Pirates went to the NLCS for a third-straight year. Jagr won the Art Ross as the Penguins went to the Eastern Conference Final.

If this season is anything like last year, Bell would be going out in exactly the same manner. The 2017 schedule was a roller coaster away from the field, but a Pro Bowl and playoff season on it. There’s no reason — barring injury — to assume this year would be any different.

Mirroring Bonds and Jagr, Bell is at the height of his powers athletically while at the nadir of his relationship with Pittsburgh fans. With every passing tweet, contract demand, and rap lyric, he alienates himself a little bit more.

By the end of their final seasons here, there was almost a sense of guilt when rooting for Jagr and Bonds individually, but you had to because the stakes for the team were so high. My bet is that will be the case this year with Bell as well.

The Steelers should contend for at least the AFC North crown again, and Bell will be a big reason why. However, there is a mercenary vibe to his presence on the team this year. For as much as his individual achievements will help the collective good, there’s a knowledge that every carry Bell has will be with an eye toward how he’ll be raising his asking price in free agency.

It shouldn’t be that way. As we saw with Jagr and Bonds, they were drafted here, too. They blossomed here. The end of what should be a legendary career here shouldn’t feel like an audition for the rest of the league.

Yet it did for those two, and it does for Bell.

Bell could go a long way toward changing that legacy if he shows All-Pro form again en route to at least a Super Bowl berth, if not a championship. Bonds never got to a World Series in Pittsburgh. Jagr was tagged with the eternal “he couldn’t win a Cup without Mario” label.

By the way, Mario never won one as player without Jagr either.

It’s not quite the same thing though, is it?

Even after spurning the Penguins for a potential return and deciding to join the Flyers, Jagr’s legacy in Pittsburgh seems to be largely repaired. His worldwide ageless-icon status is something we seem to cherish in Western Pennsylvania because it started here, he played his best here, and he won here.

Bonds has actually returned on a few occasions in recent years to more cheers than boos . Maybe that’s because there has been so much losing baseball since he left, it’s a nice reminder that Pittsburgh at least came close to having a World Series baseball team once since 1979.

Time could heal wounds for Bell in that regard, too. Already Harrison got cheers at Brett Keisel’s “Shear Da’ Beard” fundraiser. Plus, many Steelers fans were applauding his recent criticism of the Steelers undisciplined locker room.

Ironic, right, coming from him? Yeah. I thought so, too. However, some in the fan base ate it up.

Whenever Bell does report, he could go a long way to securing some of that good will after his Pittsburgh playing days by doing three simple things: winning, playing well, and saying nothing else dumb.

It appears all three are easier said than done.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.