Tim Benz: Pirates can only hope Lonnie Chisenhall turns out like Corey Dickerson |
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Pirates can only hope Lonnie Chisenhall turns out like Corey Dickerson

Tim Benz
In this Feb. 26, 2018, file photo, Cleveland Indians outfielder Lonnie Chisenhall runs to the dugout during a spring training baseball game against the Milwaukee Brewers in Maryvale, Ariz. Chisenhall has agreed to a $2.75 million, one-year contract with the Pittsburgh Pirates, leaving the Indians after eight seasons. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio, File)

Corey Dickerson 2.0? Yeah. Maybe.

That appears to be the Pirates’ hope when it comes to signing Lonnie Chisenhall.

Like Dickerson, Chisenhall looks like a guy who hit a “sell by” date with his former club, the Cleveland Indians, even though a worthy bat may still exist.

Chisenhall hit .321 with an OPS of .846 in 29 games last season. He was slowed by calf injuries in both legs.

“It was nothing they could put their finger on as to why it was occurring,” Chisenhall recalled. “The last calf tear was pretty bad. I was fully healthy by the end of the season but unable to participate in enough baseball activities to make it back before the end of the season.

“I’m feeling good now. Made a few tweaks to how I train. (Changed) what I put into my body. A few extra supplements here and there. I think it’s in the rearview mirror.”

His best, full season came in 2014. That’s when Chisenhall hit .280 with 13 homers in 533 plate appearances.

Dickerson was 28 when the Pirates traded for him last year. He impressed with a .300 batting average, an OPS of .804 and a Gold Glove.

Chisenhall is 29. Both are left-handed bats who play the outfield. Both are replacing players who were recently deemed to be cornerstones of the Pirates.

Dickerson jumped into left field when Starling Marte moved to center after Andrew McCutchen was dealt to San Francisco.

The goal appears to have Chisenhall play right field while Gregory Polanco recovers from a knee injury.

When Polanco returns, look for Chisenhall to be a left-handed bat off the bench and a platoon outfielder. He may also help in the infield, seeing as he used to play third base.

“The injury is kind of open-ended,” Chisenhall said. “It’ll stay pretty fluid. But if I had to guess, right field early on. Then we’ll play it by ear.”

Chisenhall was drafted by the Pirates in 2006 before Neal Huntington and his staff began their tenure. Chisenhall decided to play at the University of South Carolina instead of signing with the Pirates.

“I look at it like fate,” Chisenhall said. “Pittsburgh stuck their head out first (in free agency), and we were both eager to get something done. That’s actually pretty neat. Things come back around and give you another opportunity. Here we are.”

I think we all know the Pirates weren’t going to go out and get Bryce Harper to play right field. After the Pirates signed no one in free agency last season, I was concerned they were going to go with Jordan Luplow ­— who got traded to the Indians on Nov. 14 — or any other combination that came to mind to fill the void while Polanco rehabs.

So even though Chisenhall may not be a huge name to join the team, much like when they picked up Dickerson, it’s something.

“That was a great move,” Chisenhall said of the Dickerson signing. “Gold glove. Hitting the way he hit. Hopefully we can catch lightning in a bottle twice.”

Yeah. Hopefully. At $2.75 million — with $3 million in incentives — that shouldn’t be an excuse for the Pirates to stop spending this offseason. They are a team that has the pitching to contend for at least a wild-card berth next season.

But the bats need to be better. The hole in right field and the lack of depth off the bench were two of the team’s most concerning aspects.

Chisenhall isn’t a cure-all. But acquiring him is a step in the right direction.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.