Tim Benz podcast: Previewing Steelers-Chargers game with ESPN’s Eric Williams |
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz podcast: Previewing Steelers-Chargers game with ESPN’s Eric Williams

Tim Benz
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Steelers defensive lineman Cameron Heyward plays against the Chargers Monday, Oct. 12, 2015 at Qualcomm Stadium San Diego, Ca.

On the Friday “Breakfast With Benz” podcast, I’m joined by Eric Williams of He covers the Los Angeles Chargers. They visit Heinz Field on Sunday night at 8:20.

We preview the game by looking at the time change for the kickoff and whether that benefits the Steelers or L.A.

Then there is the impact of Melvin Gordon’s injury at running back. We dive into how that may alter the Chargers’ offensive approach. Is Austin Ekeler capable of mitigating Gordon’s absence?

The debate has sparked here in Pittsburgh about how the Steelers defense should best brace itself for the Chargers’ versatile receiving group. Eric describes how the pass catchers may be deployed.

We also discuss:

• Philip Rivers, on and off the field.

• How much Antonio Gates has left in the tank.

• Strengths and weaknesses of the Chargers’ defense.

• How the move from San Diego is working out so far for the franchise.

• The idea of the Steelers using James Conner a lot Sunday. Eric endorses it. Will the Steelers listen?

LISTEN: Tim Benz: Previewing the Steelers-Chargers game with ESPN’s Eric Williams

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at [email protected] or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.