Archive

ShareThis Page
Tim Benz: Ravens coach upset after Ben Roethlisberger, other QBs diving | TribLIVE.com
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Ravens coach upset after Ben Roethlisberger, other QBs diving

Tim Benz
| Friday, September 28, 2018 8:39 a.m
BenDown
Brian Blanco/Getty Images
Ben Roethlisberger is sacked by defensive end Jason Pierre-Paul during the game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers on Sept. 24, 2018 at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa.

One thing that has made me irate about the NFL’s increased penalty volume in the name of “safety” is that it has created a culture of players diving.

Receivers and ball carriers are doing it. But quarterbacks are the worst. Even Ben Roethlisberger admitted to “selling” a call against the Buccaneers.

I can’t blame Roethlisberger, specifically, for doing it. Other quarterbacks are.

Sadly, it’s a strategy.

And, historically, Roethlisberger gets fewer of those calls than the average quarterback because of his size and his knack for shedding and absorbing contact.

Recently, former official Gene Steratore flat-out admitted this was the case on WDVE ( listen at 67:37).

But I can’t blame Baltimore defensive coordinator Don Martindale for saying this either — via ESPN.com, “Let’s not turn this into the NBA flop fest,” Martindale said Thursday. “Because now the quarterbacks are making a mockery of it to the officials and the league. Now, you’re insulting the officials and the league if you do that.”

Hey, Raven or not, when a man’s right, he’s right. And Martindale is spot on here. Watching NFL games is like watching soccer’s World Cup with all the flopping that is going on.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tim at tbenz@tribweb.com or via Twitter @TimBenzPGH. All tweets could be reposted. All emails are subject to publication unless specified otherwise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.