Tim Benz: Steelers fans forget things weren’t perfect with Bill Cowher, either |
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Steelers fans forget things weren’t perfect with Bill Cowher, either

Tim Benz
Tribune Review
Head Coach Bill Cowher watches an afternoon practice session Tuesday afternoon at Steelers Training Camp 2001 at Saint Vincent College in Unity Township.

If you have read this space or listened to me on the radio over the years, you know this is a hot-button topic for me. No doubt, it’ll come up again in the not-to-distant future. So consider this a primer for similar arguments soon.

I say “no doubt” because this topic comes up whenever the Pittsburgh Steelers struggle, and they’re struggling right now. Based on what we’ve seen so far, 2018 is going to be a much tougher season than many of us expected, both on and off the field.

Since Mike Tomlin took over for Bill Cowher before the 2007 season, I have railed against the “this never would have happened if Cowher was here” refrain. The debate invariably crops up from bitter Steelers fans after Tomlin-era losses, particularly ones where on-field discipline is an issue.

Nowadays, whenever a Steelers loss occurs, off-field discipline and behavior are often blamed for bleeding over into on-field performance or “locker-room chemistry.” Frequently, those emails, talk show phone calls or tweets are punctuated with the old stand-by of “this never would have happened if Cowher was here.”

That whole mentality is a fallacy, of course. Because Cowher stuck out his jaw, spat when he yelled and screamed at punters, rookies and refs, he was viewed as a disciplinarian. The reality was that low-leverage players got chewed out, and higher profile players did what they wanted.

You know, kind of like the guy in charge now.

Joey Porter got an unsportsmanlike penalty, Troy Polamalu got a late hit, Hines Ward got a taunting flag — big deal. Josh Miller would flub a punt and “Look ‘aht! Coach ‘Caher’ is gettin’ all fired up, n’at!”

You could say this is a case of distance making the heart grow fonder. I say it’s a matter of age making our brains softer.

Here’s an example of what I mean. This tweet came to me after Antonio Brown’s latest social media dust-up, this time with a former team employee.

Independently, that complaint about Tomlin gains validation seemingly every week. Sadly, sliding in the Cowher comparison resonates as an error with the public less and less every week, too.

People really should understand how inaccurate of an equivalence that is. Consider these distractions, off-field incidents, examples of insubordination or moments where discipline was absent from Steelers players under Cowher’s watch.

• In November 1992 — Cowher’s first year ­— Eric Green got busted for violating the league’s substance-abuse policy.

• Before the 1994 AFC Championship game, some Steelers players prepped a Super Bowl rap video then proceeded to lose at home to San Diego.

• In 1996, Byron “Bam” Morris pleaded guilty to felony possession of marijuana.

• In 2000, Richard Huntley and Earl Holmes got involved in a minicamp wooden-stool-swinging brawl in the locker room.

• Plaxico Burress was cited for an open-container violation in Cleveland and public drunkenness in Virginia while he was a Steeler. He also got ejected for fighting James Trapp during a Ravens game, and he skipped a minicamp practice as a Mother’s Day protest.

• Marvel Smith was arrested for using marijuana two weeks before training camp started in 2002.

• Porter got ejected for a pregame fight in Cleveland and tried to fight Ray Lewis outside of the Baltimore team bus in 2003. This after he missed the game with his injury from a gunshot wound.

• Hines Ward held out of training camp in 2005.

Just to name a few.

You see? It did happen “when Cowher was here.” So, if you want to be selective when it comes to criticizing Tomlin, go ahead. Just don’t have selective memory when it comes to comparing him to Cowher. It undermines your argument.

Just like it does when you say “Tomlin only won with Cowher’s players.” I’m sure we’ll get to that one at some point, too.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.