ShareThis Page
Tim Benz: Time is right for NBA to dump 1-and-done rule |
Breakfast With Benz

Tim Benz: Time is right for NBA to dump 1-and-done rule

Tim Benz
| Thursday, July 12, 2018 6:15 a.m
IMG Post Grad National's Anfernee Simons #3 in action against Vermont Academy during a high school basketball game at the Hoophall Classic, Sunday, January 14, 2018, in Springfield,MA. (AP Photo/Gregory Payan)

When I read that NBA commissioner Adam Silver was gearing up to dump the league’s one-and-done requirement, I was thrilled.

Since 2005, the NBA has mandated that prospective draftees had to be at least 19 years old during the draft calendar year and at least one year removed from high school.

I don’t like it.

If an 18-year-old adult knows he is going to be a first-round draft choice and make guaranteed NBA money, he should be allowed to pursue that goal without risking injury playing for free in college. Or, if he chooses to bypass school, uproot himself for a year and play in Europe or the G-League for a fraction of what he would’ve made playing as a rookie at 18.

Not only that, but keeping a college basketball player eligible for just one year when he has no intention of staying in school beyond a few months of enrollment makes an even further mockery of the notion of “scholastic athletics.”

Of course, all that talk is really empty, politically correct altruism from an NBA point of view. In reality, the league just wants all the best talent available to them in every draft, all the time.

For a while, the one-and-done legislation seemed to make a lot of sense. Perhaps too many high school stars were giving up their college eligibility and making ill-informed choices about entering the draft.

Mike DeCourcy of the Sporting News wrote this thought provoking piece about why the rule should stay on the books back in February. He made even more compelling arguments for it in our podcast .

As DeCourcy reminds us, just because the NBA is probably about to end the one-and-done rule in 2020, that doesn’t mean a lot of kids won’t do it, anyway.

He’s right. I’m sure there will be a quite a few players who are five-star-recruit high school seniors-to-be in the class of 2019 who will complete their college freshman seasons in March of 2020 and be the like DeAndre Ayton, Marvin Bagley or Collin Sexton-types of this year.

So for people like me who are college basketball fans first, and NBA fans a distant second, the elimination of the one-and-done minimum won’t instantly cure the phenomenon in college hoops of not being able to know the roster without a scorecard.

Maybe now, though, four-star freshmen recruits will become “five-star” sophomores and juniors at college and familiarity may replace microwave fame on the marquee.

Coaches may also be able to better streamline their recruiting because they’ll have a better feel as to what their roster will look like two years down the road. They won’t have to bother flailing at the NBA-bound kids. Maybe prospects who would’ve been one-and-done players before will be inclined to stick around for at least two years because the following year’s superstars behind them will also be jumping in the draft.

I feel like it’s easier to pass on a 1-in-20 attempt to ink a surefire NBA lottery pick to your campus — or plan for that guy’s imminent departure if you do get him — than it is to be constantly surprised when you lose freshmen after just one year.

I’ll be provincial and point to my alma mater, Syracuse, which has seen that happen repeatedly with players such as Chris McCullough, Malachi Richardson, Donte Greene and Tyler Ennis.

McCullough is a good example of why the one-and-done rule is outdated, anyway. Part of the premise was that NBA general managers would be less blinded by pure size and potential and watch the player against experienced elite competition in college before projecting him as an NBA pick. But McCullough showed very little his freshman season, blew out his knee and became a late first-round pick, anyway.

It was a similar story with Michael Porter this year at Missouri. Mitchell Robinson never even played at Western Kentucky, and the Knicks took him in the second round.

Plus, it’s becoming more common to circumvent college. Darius Bazley may have started a trend by blowing off a potential one-and-done year, also at Syracuse, to go to the developmental G-League. Anfernee Simons used a post-grad year at IMG Academy before becoming the 24th overall pick with the Trailblazers.

DeCourcy’s most convincing case to keep the one-and-done rule on the books is that players will get good coaching in college and play against similar levels of competition. I’d agree and add that they’d compete in big time arenas and atmospheres on national TV and mature in the spotlight.

But the NBA is trending toward ignoring the benefits of a rule it set up for itself in the first place. The goal was to better inform scouts and general managers. Yet teams are still drafting on hunches, athleticism and potential regardless of the aid they tried to give themselves.

So what‘s the point of the rule?

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review sports columnist. You can contact Tim via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.