ShareThis Page
U mad, bro? Steelers fans spout off about defense, officials, time change |
Breakfast With Benz

U mad, bro? Steelers fans spout off about defense, officials, time change

Tim Benz
| Tuesday, December 4, 2018 10:15 p.m
Los Angeles Chargers wide receiver Keenan Allen (13), left catches a deflected pass for a touchdown in the second half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Dec. 2, 2018, in Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh Steelers free safety Sean Davis (21) is at right.

I agree with most of the complaints in this week’s “U mad, bro?”

Well, aside from the ones lashing out at me directly, of course. Those people, obviously, are always wrong.

But, for the most part, our reader complaints are spot-on this week.

That’s because many of the fans were complaining about the defense and the officiating in the Pittsburgh Steelers loss to the Los Angeles Chargers.

And that’s like shooting fish in a barrel.

I got the largest number of responses bemoaning the Steelers’ failure to defend Keenan Allen in the loss to the Chargers on Sunday.

The Los Angeles wide receiver had 148 yards on 14 catches and 19 targets. Many of those targets came while he was covered by linebackers.

That made the fans — and me — very angry.

Mike Tomlin partially blamed the injury-related absences of Morgan Burnett and Cameron Sutton for the team’s inability to get the matchups they wanted.

That’s a fair response. But why would he ever count on those two being healthy? And why would linebackers be the primary answer for addressing the holes created by those injuries? I wouldn’t have even liked Ryan Shazier in that matchup if he was healthy.

By the way, the Raiders’ top receiving option is Jared Cook.

He’s a tight end. A bit larger than Allen and perhaps not as athletic. But expect Oakland to attempt to exploit the middle of the field with a big target like him this week just as Los Angeles did with Allen.

Here’s one of the dozens of retorts I got about the officials.

Did Sam Tevi false start at right tackle?

No, #JerryMealsSaysHesSafe.

Kidding aside, Mike is right. Between the unflagged false starts, the block in the back on the punt-return touchdown and the long snapper moving the ball on the field goal misses at the end of the game, the officials were terrible.

The zebras weren’t the only reason the Steelers lost. But they blew three calls on scoring plays. That’s inexcusable.

This reader on Twitter didn’t like my column about Notre Dame being in the college football playoff without needing to play a conference championship game.

Did I bring strength-of-schedule into question? I don’t think I did that. Did I do that?

Nope. Just checked. Didn’t do that.

What I did do is suggest that somehow Notre Dame fans would find a way to be offended by the column, even though I fired back at any argument stating the Irish should be left out.

Thanks for proving my point.

This fellow is grasping at straws as to why the Steelers lost to the Chargers. I kind of thought it was an inability to create turnovers, cover Keenan Allen and find steady special teams play.

But this is probably a bigger deal, right?

So, I guess they were sleepy when the game kicked off at 5:20 p.m. Pacific time? I mean, don’t the Chargers start most of their home games at 1:25 p.m. local time?

Yet, suddenly, after getting down 23-7, they were wide awake after halftime when they stormed back to win 33-30, I suppose.

Wow. Someone has an inflated sense of the fans’ importance. Do you think maybe the other team’s play — let alone that of the home club — impacted the outcome at all?

Plus, the Steelers had been 27-8 at Heinz Field in night games before Sunday. You can’t pull out an excuse like this now just because they lost.

Grow up.

This guy took umbrage with my sense of foreboding before Chris Boswell’s attempt to tie the game with an extra point at 30-29.

Glenn, if you weren’t thinking the same thing, you weren’t paying attention all year. Boswell missed an extra point earlier in the game. He’s done that five times this season.

Don’t get mad at me for typing what every Steelers fan was worried about at the time.

The fans in the stands were really mad … at each other!

Then there was this incident.

I can only assume those guys were arguing about something as important as the flexed time change at kickoff.

Tim Benz is a Tribune-Review sports columnist. You can contact Tim via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.