Archive

No. 3 Georgia turns road test into rout of No. 24 South Carolina | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World Sports

No. 3 Georgia turns road test into rout of No. 24 South Carolina

The Associated Press
212323212323f31cca68c2d544c2a62fed13d983d52c
Georgia wide receiver Mecole Hardman (4) celebrates with offensive lineman Solomon Kindley (66) after scoring a touchdown against South Carolina during the second half Saturday, Sept. 8, 2018, in Columbia, S.C.

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Georgia quarterback Jake Fromm knew the third-ranked Bulldogs were built to last after their run to last season’s national title game. He believes the rest of the country found that out Saturday.

Fromm threw for 194 yards and a touchdown, all three of Georgia’s latest running combo scored touchdowns and the Bulldogs turned an expected SEC showdown into a 41-17 rout over No. 24 South Carolina on Saturday.

“We weren’t going anywhere,” Fromm said. “We’ve worked too hard to stay where we are.”

That was evident at Williams-Brice Stadium, where Georgia (2-0, 1-0 SEC) used dominating offense and suffocating defense to win its fourth straight over the Gamecocks (1-1, 0-1).

“We thought if we were able to run the ball and pound it early, it would take its toll,” coach Kirby Smart said.

Fromm was 15-for-18 passing, including a 34-yard TD pass to Mecole Hardman. D’Andre Swift, Elijah Holyfield and Brian Herrien looked every bit as effective as NFL runners Nick Chubb and Sony Michel did a year ago in leading Georgia to the College Football Playoff.

Holyfield led the way with 76 yards and a 5-yard score. Swift had a 17-yard TD run, and Herrien piled on with a 15-yard scoring burst in the third quarter as Georgia went up by 31 points. That’s when many in the crowd of 83,140 began to file out in disappointment — a familiar ritual against the Bulldogs.

Cornerback Deandre Baker set the tone on defense early with an interception off a tipped ball in the opening minute that led to a quick, if unconventional, touchdown. Baker let the ball loose before crossing the goal line, but teammate Juwan Taylor picked it up and took it the final yard to complete the 56-yard play.

Baker did not initially realize he came up short. “I just hoped someone on my team picked it up,” he said, smiling.

From there, Georgia’s defense and run game took over — as they have so often against South Carolina. The Bulldogs outrushed South Carolina, 271-54.

When South Carolina had a chance to tie it after Rashad Fenton’s interception deep in Georgia territory, the Bulldogs allowed just a yard on the next four plays. They took over on downs after Bentley’s fourth-down incompletion.

“That was big,” Smart said. “We always talk about putting out the fire on defense after a turnover.”

Georgia rarely let up. South Carolina drove 70 yards to the Bulldogs 5 in the fourth quarter before safety J.R. Reed’s end-zone interception.

South Carolina quarterback Jake Bentley threw for 269 yards with two touchdowns and two interceptions.

Gamecocks coach Will Muschamp was disappointed, especially at his team’s third quarter when Georgia outscored South Carolina, 21-0.

“We’ve got a lot of football ahead of us. The big thing you do, we’ve got to be technical. Starting with me,” Muschamp said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.