WPIAL girls basketball rankings for the week of Dec. 23, 2018 |
High School Basketball

WPIAL girls basketball rankings for the week of Dec. 23, 2018

Chris Harlan
Louis Raggiunti | For the Tribune-Review
Mary Kromka and the Gateway Gators are ranked No. 5 in WPIAL 5A girls basketball.


Girls basketball

Class 6A

Team, record, previous

1. North Allegheny, 8-0, 1

2. Peters Township, 6-0, 2

3. Bethel Park, 6-0, 3

4. Norwin, 6-0, 4

5. Fox Chapel, 5-1, —

Out: Seneca Valley (5-2, 5)

Class 5A

1. Chartiers Valley*, 6-0, 1

2. Mars, 6-0, 2

3. Oakland Catholic, 6-1, 3

4. Penn Hills, 5-2, 5

5. Gateway, 5-2, 4

Out: none

Class 4A

1. North Catholic, 5-0, 1

2. Blackhawk, 5-1, 2

3. Central Valley*, 5-0, 4

4. Elizabeth Forward, 4-3, 3

5. Freeport, 5-1, 5

Out: none

Class 3A

1. Beaver, 6-0, 2

2. East Allegheny, 5-1, 1

3. Neshannock, 5-2, 3

4. Washington, 6-0, —

5. Shady Side Academy, 6-0, —

Out: Avonworth (4-2, 4), South Park (3-3, 5)

Class 2A

1. Bishop Canevin*, 4-1, 1

2. OLSH, 4-2, 2

3. Serra Catholic, 4-1, 3

4. Laurel, 5-2, 5

5. Brentwood, 5-2, 4

Out: none

Class A

1. West Greene, 7-1, 1

2. Greensburg C.C., 6-0, 3

3. Rochester, 5-3, —

4. Sewickley Academy, 4-2, 2

5. Eden Christian, 4-2, —

Out: Vincentian Academy (3-4, 4), Quigley Catholic (2-4, 5)

*Not including Saturday’s results

Chris Harlan is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.