ShareThis Page
WVU football eyes 2nd Big 12 upset |

WVU football eyes 2nd Big 12 upset

| Friday, October 18, 2013 10:19 p.m
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
West Virginia safety Darwin Cook (25) celebrates his fourth-quarter interception of Oklahoma State quarterback J.W. Walsh (4) with teammates Brandon Golson (2) and Will Clarke (98) on Saturday, Sept. 28, 2013, at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va.
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
West Virginia linebacker Isaiah Bruce (31) celebrates a second-quarter fumble recovery against Oklahoma State on Saturday, Sept. 28, 2013, at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va.
West Virginia wide receiver Kevin White pulls down a pass over Baylor cornerback K.J. Morton during the first half Saturday, Oct. 5, 2013, in Waco, Texas.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — Clearly not among the Big 12 elite, West Virginia hopes to establish itself as a spoiler while building up its own bowl resume as it faces unbeaten No. 16 Texas Tech in its homecoming game at noon Saturday at Milan Puskar Stadium.

The Mountaineers already have upset then-No. 11 Oklahoma State at home and, despite being unsettled at quarterback, believe they have a chance to pull off a second upset in a season loaded with top teams. WVU has lost to Oklahoma, Maryland and Baylor.

“This is the fourth time we have played an undefeated and ranked team in the Big 12,” coach Dana Holgorsen said. “The challenge is large, but I can assure you we are up for the challenge.”

“We started talking about that back in January,” defensive coordinator Keith Patterson said. “It’s the Big 12. You beat Oklahoma State, then you have an undefeated team waiting on you. It’s no different now. We have another undefeated team. Texas Tech is a top-15 team in the country.”

“It’s actually good,” linebacker Isaiah Bruce said. “It gives us a chance to bring them down a level. It definitely makes us step up our game — going against an undefeated team. It just makes us want to play even harder.”

The Mountaineers believe they are familiar enough with Texas Tech’s offense that they have an advantage. Holgorsen worked previously with Red Raiders coach Kliff Kingsbury and roomed with him when they were on the staff at Houston.

“Offensively, it is something that we know very well,” Holgorsen said. “Obviously, I have a history with Kliff, and I know what he has done offensively and how he operates. We are both cut from the same cloth. So, we are going to know what they do offensively. Obviously, the challenge is to stop it.”

The thing that makes that difficult is the presence of tight end Jace Amaro, a 6-foot-5, 260-pound weapon who has emerged as the Red Raiders’ top receiver with 47 catches after catching just 25 in seven games last year.

“He is big, fast and strong, and he blocks well and catches well,” Holgorsen said. “This year he has been hard to contain.”

WVU’s linebackers and safeties will be asked to pay special attention to Amaro.

Offensively, Holgorsen has withheld naming his starting quarterback between juniors Clint Trickett and Paul Millard, just as Tech has not named a starter from Baker Mayfield and Michael Brewer.

“We have done a pretty good job, in my opinion, of getting the play started in the run game but have not done a great job at getting the play started in the pass game,” Holgorsen said. “They have to go hand-in-hand.”

Bob Hertzel is a freelance writer.

Categories: WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.