WVU notebook: Back-up plan nearly works for Mountaineers |

WVU notebook: Back-up plan nearly works for Mountaineers

Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
West Virginia quarterback Skyler Howard (3) prepares to pass as Kansas State defensive end Marquel Bryant (45) gives chase Thursday, Nov. 20, 2014, in Morgantown, W.Va.

You generally have to win to write a storybook ending, and Skyler Howard barely ran out of ink.

West Virginia’s backup quarterback did, however, inject a shot of adrenaline into another languid offensive performance, rewarding those who stuck around Thursday night at chilly Milan Puskar Stadium by nearly pulling out an improbable victory.

With much of the season-low crowd of 47,683 having fled and the Mountaineers trailing No. 12 Kansas State, 20-3, with 9:23 left in the third quarter, Howard came in for starter Clint Trickett. A concussion was the stated reason, but few would have blamed WVU coach Dana Holgorsen for going to the bullpen regardless.

Trickett completed 12 of 25 passes for 112 yards, no touchdowns and two interceptions, continuing his slump after a brilliant first half of the season. He was sacked three times, and a botched handoff resulted in another turnover. The Mountaineers (6-5, 4-4 Big 12) lost their third straight 26-20. WVU managed three first-half points for the second successive game, creating another difficult comeback scenario.

Howard did what he could. A 6-foot-2, 200-pound sophomore whose work this season consisted of two incompletions, he displayed nimble feet and an accurate arm. In less than two quarters, Howard went 15 for 23 for 198 yards and two touchdowns and had three scrambles for 16 yards. He turned what appeared hopeless into a game that remained in doubt until K-State fielded an onside kick with less than a minute left.

Howard transferred to WVU after one season at Riverside City College, a junior college in California. He assumed the No. 2 role last month after a nagging shoulder injury sidelined freshman William Crest.

“The thing is, being a backup quarterback, you got to stay ready,” Howard said. “I go through the same practice as Clint (Trickett) does. I throw to the same guys. Just putting the ball in play and they do the rest. … There’s nerves but good nerves because I was prepared. I stay ready all season and wait for opportunity to rise, and I took advantage of it.”

“If you look through his career, junior college and everything, he’s typically been a gamer,” offensive coordinator Shannon Dawson said. “He really did the same thing at the juco he was at. He wasn’t really the starter when he got there, and a couple games in, they threw him in and he ended up playing great.

“I think the kid competes. He definitely has a knack for competing and likes to compete. He’s a tough kid. I’m proud of him to go in there and do that.”

What do you really think?

Holgorsen was unsparing in his criticism of Nick O’Toole, whose 35-yard punt turned into Tyler Lockett’s 43-yard touchdown return in the second quarter.

“Horrible punt,” Holgorsen said. “Our whole team went right. (O’Toole) mishit it left. I could have scored. That’s not a coaching error. That’s a player error. We talk about it all the time. We send the team right, he needs to punt it right. He missed it. It went left. He wasn’t confused. He just missed it. It’s obviously a big play.”

And furthermore …

Other than Howard, a bright spot was WVU’s run defense. The Mountaineers slowed mobile quarterback Jake Waters (12 carries, 13 yards), holding K-State to a net 1 yard in 29 rushing attempts. … His troublesome ankle finally healed, WVU’s Rushel Shell ran 15 times for 60 yards, including a long run of 18 yards on which he leaped over a would-be tackler. He also took a screen pass for 13 yards. … K-State, the nation’s second-least penalized team with 32, got flagged 10 times for 132 yards.

Bob Cohn is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.