ShareThis Page
WVU notebook: KSU’s Snyder has success with walk-ons |

WVU notebook: KSU’s Snyder has success with walk-ons

MORGANTOWN, W.Va — Perhaps no college football coach is identified with turning walk-ons into scholarship players like Kansas State’s Bill Snyder.

Three of the Wildcats’ five regular captains who started Thursday against West Virginia are former walk-ons: Center B.J. Finney, a three-time All-Big 12 selection, linebacker Jonathan Truman and defensive end Ryan Mueller, the Big 12 Defensive Lineman of the Year in 2013.

Ten walk-ons on the roster have started at least one game in their careers, nine this season, totaling 148 career starts. Snyder estimates he has awarded scholarships to 200 walk-ons during his 23 years as coach.

Jordy Nelson, the Green Bay Packers’ star receiver, was a K-State walk-on. So were Rock Cartwright, an NFL running back for 11 seasons, and Jon McGraw, a 10-year NFL defensive back.

WVU, meanwhile, has no walk-ons who have started.

Shell game

Rushel Shell started at running back for WVU after playing sparingly in the past four games, mainly because of a sprained ankle. The former Hopewell star, in his first season at WVU after transferring from Pitt, led the team in rushing for most of the season before being overtaken by Wendell Smallwood.

Shell saw plenty of action in the first half with 10 carries for 31 yards. In the prior four WVU games, he had just 16 carries.

Smart guys

WVU kickoff specialist Michael Molinari and reserve offensive tackle Michael Calicchio were named to the Academic All-Big 12 first team.

It was Molinari’s third straight year on the first team.

Center Tyler Orlosky, punter Nick O’Toole, quarterback Paul Millard, long snapper Johnathan DePalma and offensive tackle Grant Lingafelter were named to the second team.

— Bob Cohn

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.