ShareThis Page
WVU picked second in Big 12 preseason poll |

WVU picked second in Big 12 preseason poll

Jerry DiPaola
| Thursday, July 12, 2018 4:06 p.m
Texas defensive back Brandon Jones (19) tackles West Virginia quarterback Will Grier (7) short of the goal line during the first half of an NCAA college football game, Saturday, Nov. 18, 2017, in Morgantown, W.Va. Grier injured his hand in during the play and left the game. (AP Photo/Raymond Thompson)

With Heisman Trophy candidate Will Grier preparing to lead the offense at quarterback, West Virginia was picked to finish second in the Big 12 by media members voting in the conference’s preseason poll.

Oklahoma, which has played in the College Football Playoff semifinal in two of the past three years, received 46 of the 52 first-place votes, with West Virginia getting two. TCU, Texas and Oklahoma State rounded out the top five. The other first-place votes went to TCU and Texas (one each) and sixth-place Kansas State (two).

Iowa State, Texas Tech, Baylor and Kansas filled the final four spots. Last season, eight of the 10 teams qualified for bowls.

In the past four years, West Virginia is the only team in the Big 12 to finish higher than its preseason prediction.

The top two finishers will move on to the Big 12 Football Championship Game Dec. 1.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review pitt football reporter. You can contact Jerry at 412-320-7997, or via Twitter .

Categories: WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.