ShareThis Page
WVU RB Shell aims to finish strong by going back to power running style |

WVU RB Shell aims to finish strong by going back to power running style

David Statman
| Thursday, August 25, 2016 5:54 p.m
Dale Sparks | All-Pro Photography
West Virginia's Rushel Shell looks for an opening during the Gold-Blue game Saturday, April 23, 2016, at The Greenbrier Resort.
Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
West Virginia senior running back Rushel Shell rushed for 708 yards and eight touchdowns last season.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — At Hopewell, Rushel Shell was a force of nature, a battering ram that smashed through opposing defenses en route to becoming Pennsylvania’s all-time leading rusher.

His college career hasn’t quite followed the same template. Shell ditched Pitt for rival West Virginia after one season, and while he has shown flashes over the past few years, he never has been a star.

But Shell finally will have the chance to be the man in 2016, and West Virginia is expecting big things out of the senior — if he can block out negative voices around him and revert to the dominant mindset he had at Hopewell.

“The biggest thing that I had to tell him was you have to get over perception and what people think of you and what you should do,” running back coach JaJuan Seider said. “It’s about getting out there and doing what you can do. Stop worrying about, ‘I have to hit the hole this way because that’s what they said.’ Stop that. Just play ball. Go do what you did in high school.”

Shell ran for a team-high 823 yards and seven touchdowns in 2014 but last year was benched on occasion as junior Wendell Smallwood emerged as the Big 12’s leading rusher.

Shell’s workload and production went down across the board, even as West Virginia ran the ball more than ever in the Dana Holgorsen era. And while Smallwood is a Philadelphia Eagle, Shell remains surrounded by talent.

Coaches have raved about explosive junior college transfer Justin Crawford and comfortable-beyond-his-years freshman Kennedy McKoy. Seider has hinted that, despite Shell’s experience, the carries will be divided up by committee.

If Shell doesn’t produce, West Virginia has options. He won’t get the majority of the playing time just because he is a senior. Seider is looking for the version of Shell that stepped onto the field in gold and blue two years ago: the strong and motivated power back who will pound the defense for chunks of hard yardage.

“We need the guy who played against Alabama and Oklahoma,” Seider said. “We need the guy who says, ‘I’m going to run right at you, and you need to stop me.’ That’s what I tell him. I don’t need him to break 80-yard runs all the time. I need him to go give me that 10, 15 yards.

“If you give me what Wendell gave me, that 10 yards at a time, I’ll be happy. I think we have some other guys who can break the long runs, so just be that guy. And in the end, you can have those 200-, 300-yard games if you continue to do those things.”

Shell and Seider have made it no secret that the senior’s goal is to play in the NFL, something that Smallwood and Charles Sims before him achieved. The best way to make that ha�ppen is to focus on one final year at West Virginia and reach for a milestone he hasn’t touched in college.

“It’s that 1,000-yard mark,” Shell said. “I just haven’t broke it yet in my college career. That starts with big plays, runs over 10 yards, stuff like that. I don’t worry too much about it because that’s when you get, like, a 300-yard season.”

David Statman is a freelance writer.

Categories: WVU
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.