ShareThis Page
PA health secretary leaves Wolf administration for Geisinger Health |

PA health secretary leaves Wolf administration for Geisinger Health

| Tuesday, June 27, 2017 11:00 a.m
Secretary of Health Karen Murphy

Pennsylvania Health Secretary Karen Murphy is leaving Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration to take a top job at Geisinger Health, an integrated hospital and insurer system in a competitive market at the center of the state.

Murphy will be an executive vice president, chief innovation officer and founding director of the Steele Institute for Healthcare Innovation at Geisinger, which is based in Danville, according to a news release Tuesday.

The 12-hospital system faces a wave of competition in the region from UPMC, which formed nearby UPMC Susquehanna through an affiliation last fall and has been buying or affiliating with small community hospitals in the region. Geisinger announced in May that it was pursuing a joint venture with Highmark Inc. in the region that would include a medical campus in the Montoursville area.

A nurse with graduate degrees in business administration, Murphy directed a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services program focused on health care innovation across states before joining the Wolf administration. Before that, she was president and chief executive officer of the Moses Taylor Health Care System in Scranton, where she founded an integrated medical group practice.

“Secretary Murphy has worked throughout her career to develop innovative ways to improve health and transform health care delivery, which fits perfectly with Geisinger’s emphasis on caring and putting our patients at the center of everything we do,” Dr. David Feinberg, Geisinger’s president and chief executive officer, said in the release.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676, or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.