ShareThis Page
State increases fines for late lobbyist spending reports |

State increases fines for late lobbyist spending reports

The Pennsylvania State Capitol in Harrisburg

Being late with their paperwork will cost state lobbyists more under a new law that takes effect in about two months.

Current law penalizes them $50 a day for every day they’re late in filing their quarterly spending reports with the state Ethics Commission.

The House and Senate passed a bill earlier this month that replaces the flat fine with a graduated fine that increases the daily penalty based on how many days the report is overdue. Gov. Tom Wolf signed the bill into law Wednesday.

The new fine is $50 per day for the first 10 days, $100 per day for the next 10 days and $200 per day after that.

The Ethics Commission issues about 20 fines per year for late filings, according to a Senate fiscal note attached to the legislation. The fines generate an average of $60,000 in revenue for the state, which comes out to each report being about 60 days late.

The same averages for the number of late reports and average number of days would produce about $190,000 in fines.

The new law also requires lobbyists to file all their reports through the commission’s online system. Currently about 80 percent of reports are filed online.

The current law makes several activities by lobbyists illegal , such as getting a legislator to introduce a bill so that the lobbyist can then hire himself out to oppose that bill. The current civil penalty is capped at $2,000. The new law raises the cap to $4,000.

Brian Bowling is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1218, or via Twitter @TribBrian.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.