Pittsburgh event will explore letting citizens draw congressional districts |

Pittsburgh event will explore letting citizens draw congressional districts

Wesley Venteicher
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court released a new map of the state's congressional district boundaries earlier this year.

Three members of California’s Citizens Redistricting Commission will talk Thursday night in Pittsburgh about how the commission works in their state and how a similar proposal might pan out in Pennsylvania.

A proposal to create an 11-member citizen redistricting commission is moving toward a vote in the Pennsylvania Senate after it cleared the State Government Committee on Tuesday. The commission would put citizens in charge of drawing new maps every 10 years instead of leaving the process to legislators.

Fair Districts PA, which has pushed for the change, is one of the groups hosting the Pittsburgh event, scheduled for 6:30 p.m. at the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary. The event is open to the public.

“The goal is to educate the public; the goal is to bring these people from California to talk about how they were successful; the goal is to provide the public with updates on what’s going on and what the next steps might be,” said David Misra, a Community College of Allegheny County professor who is volunteering with Fair Districts PA.

The push for changes comes after the state Supreme Court ruled early this year that the state’s congressional district map was unconstitutionally gerrymandered to benefit Republicans. Under the old map, Republicans held 13 of the state’s 18 districts.

The court instituted a new map drawn with help from a Stanford Law School professor that is expected to be more favorable for Democrats.

Fair Districts PA supports the Pennsylvania redistricting proposal, which mimics California’s system. The Pennsylvania Senate amended the original proposal to give lawmakers more say in who is selected for the group.

The change would require a constitutional amendment. To be in place by the 2020 Census and the redistricting process that will follow, the proposal would need to be approved before this year’s session ends July 8 and then approved again during next year’s session.

House Majority Leader Dave Reed and Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati have suggested they support changes to the redistricting process, fueling optimism among advocates that the process could change.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.