House moves to amend medical marijuana law’s research rules |

House moves to amend medical marijuana law’s research rules

The Associated Press
Medical marijuana plants

HARRISBURG, Pa. — State lawmakers moved Tuesday to reinstate the research provision of Pennsylvania’s medical marijuana law, a month after a court decision left it in limbo.

The House voted 167-31 to change the law by laying out more explicitly the goal of its provisions allowing medical schools to partner with companies that grow the drug and provide it to patients.

“We worked very hard so that indeed real research not only will have the opportunity to occur, but it’s going to be required to occur,” said Rep. Kathy Watson, R-Bucks, who sponsored the amendment.

The proposal, which was sent to the Senate, was prompted by a Commonwealth Court judge’s decision last month to issue a preliminary injunction against Health Department regulations for licenses issued to growers and dispensaries that partner with state medical schools.

The judge, ruling in a challenge brought by dispensaries and growers who were awarded licenses in a separate, competitive process, said the research-related regulations seemed to require that the companies with medical school partners have only a minimal commitment to research.

The amendment that passed Tuesday said the Legislature’s goal is to encourage the partnerships so that patient safety will be improved.

“The commonwealth has an interest in creating a mechanism whereby the commonwealth’s medical schools and hospitals can help develop research programs and studies,” the amendment declared.

Judith Cassel, a lawyer for the companies that sued over the regulations, said Watson’s amendment did not resolve her client’s concerns, and if the bill passes the Senate they may end up back in court.

“It doesn’t solve the fact that people who never went through the vetting process, or went through the vetting process and failed, can get a clinical registrant permit,” Cassel said.

During the House debate, Rep. Gerald Mullery, D-Luzerne, argued it was not fair for the clinical registrants to be able to get licenses without having prevailed what he called the “ultracompetitive” process under which the state picked the other grower-processors and dispensaries.

“We are too quickly expanding the market to the detriment of our commercial partners by not creating a level playing field,” Mullery said.

Pennsylvania allows patients access to medical marijuana if they have been certified by a qualified physician as having one of 21 medical conditions.

The state currently has 20 dispensaries that are providing the drug, and about 23,000 patients have obtained the ID card required to purchase medical marijuana.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.