Enrollment at Pennsylvania’s state universities drops for eighth straight year |

Enrollment at Pennsylvania’s state universities drops for eighth straight year

Deb Erdley

Enrollment at the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education dipped for the eighth consecutive year, system officials said Monday.

A census taken at the 14 state-owned universities as of the 15th day of the fall semester revealed enrollment declined from 102,301 last fall to 98,094. The roughly 4 percent decline was double the projected 2 percent decline. State System schools in Western Pennsylvania include California, Clarion, Edinboro, Indiana and Slippery Rock universities.

The latest numbers reflect an 18 percent drop in enrollment — or a loss of 21,419 students statewide — since 2010, when enrollment peaked at 119,513 students.

Only West Chester University in suburban Philadelphia has seen enrollment grow during that period — from 14,490 in 2010 to 17,552 this fall. In Western Pennsylvania, Slippery Rock managed to at least stem the flow. It enrolled 8,852 students in 2010, compared to 8,824 this fall.

Elsewhere, some of the losses are stunning.

Cheyney University, the nation’s oldest historically black post-secondary institution, saw enrollment plummet from 1,586 in 2010 to 469 this fall — a loss of 70 percent. Mansfield University in north central Pennsylvania experienced a 52 percent decline in enrollment, going from 3,411 in 2010 to 1,637 today. Elsewhere, decline in enrollment ranged from 11 percent to 44 percent.

The losses are especially troubling at the public universities that rely upon tuition for more than two-thirds of their revenue.

The latest enrollment numbers came as the system’s new chancellor, Dan Greenstein, crisscrossed the state on a tour of the 14 campuses.

According to the National Student Clearinghouse, college enrollment nationally has declined every year for the last seven years as the economy improved and new high school graduating classes grew smaller. The most recent national numbers — from spring 2017 to spring 2018 — showed college enrollment down 1.3 percent, with the largest losses at community colleges and for-profit schools.

PASSHE spokesman Kenn Marshall said enrollment declines at the state-owned universities reflect a decline in the number of new high school graduates, especially in Western Pennsylvania; an improving economy that may be luring some students into the workforce; and the increasing cost of higher education.

“Cost, unfortunately, continues to be a challenge to some students and families,” he said.

PASSHE’s enrollment declines stand out, even in Pennsylvania.

The University of Pittsburgh, a state-related national research university, reported enrollment declines of about 3 percent between 2010 and 2017. It has yet to publish its fall 2018 enrollment numbers.

The new enrollment numbers will no doubt be a consideration as state system officials, university leaders and members of the system’s oversight board work on a new comprehensive plan to guide the system into the future.

“I think that we’re going to be looking at enrollment, costs and programs. It’s fair to say enrollment across the system will be part of the discussion,” Marshall said. “We know our graduation and retention numbers are better than those of similar universities, but all of the universities are taking a closer look at increasing enrollment, retention and graduation.”

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, [email protected] or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.