Official’s ties to voting machine vendor prompt statewide inquiry |

Official’s ties to voting machine vendor prompt statewide inquiry


Auditor General Eugene DePasquale announced Wednesday that his office will launch a statewide investigation into how counties select voting machines and equipment, based on what he called the “outrageous” case of Luzerne County elections director Marisa Crispell and a “junket” she took to Las Vegas — paid for by county vendor Election Systems & Software last year.

Luzerne County purchased voting machines from ES&S in 2006 and earlier this year purchased an electronic poll book system from the company for about $325,000.

DePasquale, speaking in Olyphant at a news conference, said he learned Saturday that Crispell served on the ES&S customer advisory board last year and traveled to advisory board meetings in Las Vegas and Nebraska, for which ES&S paid her travel and lodging expenses.

“Outrage does not begin to describe how ticked off I was,” he said.

DePasquale focused on the trip to Las Vegas in March 2017.

“The idea that any public official in Pennsylvania would go to Vegas for a junket for a company they are helping get taxpayer dollars for, let alone for elections, is a disgrace,” he said.

DePasquale said he wants to find out what Crispell did while in Las Vegas.

He also said he wants to know if election officials in other Pennsylvania counties have similar close ties to vendors, which he called “unacceptable.”

“We are launching an investigation to … review the entire procurement process on how these machines are selected,” he said, adding later that “Having any vendor pay for a junket is unacceptable.”

DePasquale said he plans to question Crispell directly, and also might want to talk to other county officials.

Crispell has said she resigned from the ES&S advisory board in October 2017, before the county requested proposals for the poll book system from vendors. She did not disclose her service on the advisory board to county council before council voted to purchase the poll books from ES&S in April 2018. Council members have complained about the lack of disclosure.

Crispell says she did not feel it necessary to disclose her prior advisory board role to council, since she informed the county elections board, its solicitor Michael Butera and county Director of Administrative Services David Parsnik, none of whom objected.

DePasquale on Wednesday said that even had Crispell provided full disclosure, her service on the advisory board of a county vendor was improper.

“I don’t care if she put it on Twitter and Facebook and held a press conference,” he said. “The whole system that allowed it is wrong.”

DePasquale said if Crispell’s supervisors knew of and approved her expenses-paid trips to ES&S advisory board meetings, he “will have some tough questions for them.”

Crispell did not immediately return messages seeking comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.