ShareThis Page
Retired Army officer Peters quits analyst role for ‘propaganda machine’ Fox News |

Retired Army officer Peters quits analyst role for ‘propaganda machine’ Fox News

Then-Fox News analyst Ralph Peters appears on 'The O'Reilly Factor,' hosted by Bill O'Reilly.

Citing an oath to “support and defend the Constitution” that “did not expire when I took off my uniform,” retired Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters wrote Tuesday that he would no longer work as an analyst for Fox News, which he labeled a “propaganda machine.”

Peters slammed his former employer in an email to colleagues that was reported by BuzzFeed. “Over my decade with Fox, I long was proud of the association. Now I am ashamed,” he wrote.

The veteran was a fierce and frequent critic of former President Obama, calling him “inept” and “cowardly” — and blunter, profane words that got him suspended from Fox News in 2016 — for his policies in the Middle East. In 2015, he said “the only president on the American continent who has done more damage” than Obama “was actually Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States of America.”

The firebrand commentator said in his email that Fox News had “degenerated from providing a legitimate and much-needed outlet for conservative voices to a mere propaganda machine for a destructive and ethically ruinous administration.”

In particular, Peters took issue with the network’s treatment of investigation into Russian meddling in American politics. He cited “profoundly dishonest assaults on the FBI, the Justice Department, the courts, the intelligence community … and, not least, a model public servant and genuine war hero such as Robert Mueller.”

Peters said hosts who “justifiably” criticized Obama’s policy toward Russia “now advance [Russian President Vladimir] Putin’s agenda.”

The Pottsville native who attended college at Penn State cited his experience as a military intelligence officer who was detailed to the Soviet Union and Russia. “That’s how the Russians do things,” he said.

Fox News released a statement suggesting Peters was fishing for publicity: “Ralph Peters is entitled to his opinion despite the fact that he’s choosing to use it as a weapon in order to gain attention. We are extremely proud of our top-rated primetime hosts and all of our opinion programing.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.