Dallas cop Amber Guyger fired after manslaughter charge for killing neighbor |

Dallas cop Amber Guyger fired after manslaughter charge for killing neighbor

This file photo provided by the Kaufman County Sheriff’s Office shows Amber Renee Guyger. Guyger, a Dallas police officer accused of fatally shooting her neighbor inside his own apartment has been dismissed, the police department announced Monday, Sept. 24, 2018.

Dallas police Officer Amber Guyger, who fatally shot 26-year-old Botham Jean in his apartment, was fired Monday — days after Police Chief Renee Hall said doing so would compromise the criminal investigation.

Police said in a news release that Hall fired Guyger after an internal investigation found the officer had engaged in “adverse conduct” when she was charged with manslaughter three days after the shooting.

Guyger’s firing was lauded by the mayor — who called it “the right decision in the interest of justice” — and others who have been calling for her termination for weeks. Guyger has been on administrative leave since the shooting and is free, as she awaits trial, on a $300,000 bond.

Guyger shot Jean, her upstairs neighbor, the night of Sept. 6. She told authorities she mistook his apartment for her own and believed Jean, who was unarmed, was a burglar. Lee Merritt, an attorney for Jean’s family, has cast doubt on Guyger’s version of events.

Hall’s decision to fire Guyger came after widespread calls for action. Protesters had called for her to be fired for weeks. Her employment status even became an issue in the U.S. Senate race between Sen. Ted Cruz and Rep. Beto O’Rourke. The latter, a Democrat, had called for her firing, while Cruz had said O’Rourke was rushing to judgment.

Guyger is allowed to appeal the decision under civil service rules, police said.

The announcement of Guyger’s firing came shortly before Hall stepped into a City Council Public Safety & Criminal Justice Committee hearing. The only discussion of the firing during the meeting came when council member Kevin Felder said he had heard Guyger had been fired and asked the chief to confirm.

“That is a true statement,” Hall said, without elaboration.

Hall’s decision to fire the officer seemed to contradict statements she had made in recent days about why she wouldn’t fire Guyger yet.

The chief said at a town hall meeting Tuesday that she couldn’t fire Guyger before an internal investigation was completed because of federal, state and local laws. She didn’t specify to which laws she was referring. Hall’s chief of staff, Thomas Taylor, had said the internal investigation was on hold until a criminal investigation into Guyger was complete.

On Thursday, Hall released a statement saying she didn’t want to risk interfering with a criminal investigation by making a decision about Guyger’s employment.

“As an employer, DPD can compel Officer Guyger to provide a statement during a DPD administrative investigation and those statements given to DPD could potentially compromise the criminal investigation,” Hall said in a written statement.

The Dallas Police Department turned over the investigation to the Texas Rangers shortly after the shooting. The Dallas County district attorney’s office is also conducting its own investigation.

Those investigations aren’t complete, but Hall said Monday police were notified that a “critical portion” of the criminal investigation — the part that she said could’ve been compromised by an internal investigation — had concluded over the weekend.

“As a police chief, my job is to ensure the highest level of integrity in this investigation, and that is what I did,” she said. “I waited until the critical portion of this investigation was complete.”

Michael Mata, president of the Dallas Police Association, said Monday he had no idea Guyger was going to be fired until Hall’s statement was released. He said he was “perturbed” by the news, and confused by what he called “short-sightedness and short cuts” leading to her firing.

“Four days ago she said she couldn’t fire her because of the investigation, and now, four days, later you can?” Mata said. “Just be honest with the public. There is a process in place that not only affords an office due process but allows the department to have security if and when an officer attempts to get their job back.”

But Mayor Mike Rawlings said in a statement that Hall “made the right call” in firing Guyger.

“I have heard the calls for this action from many, including the Jean family, and I agree that this is right decision in the interest of justice for Botham Jean and the citizens of Dallas,” he said in the statement. “The swift termination of any officer who engages in misconduct that leads to the loss of innocent life is essential if the Dallas Police Department is to gain and maintain the public trust.”

Attorneys for the Jean family said Jean’s parents got a call from Hall on Sunday, in which she told them she intended to fire Guyger and explained the delay.

Merritt, one of the family’s attorneys, said that while the delay was frustrating, he’s glad the chief waited until all the statements made about Jean’s killing had been thoroughly investigated.

He said the trial of former Balch Springs Officer Roy Oliver was complicated by complaints that the officer’s Fifth Amendment rights had been violated by his department’s decision to fire him just days after he shot into a car and killed 15-year-old Jordan Edwards.

The Jean family was satisfied with both the termination and explanation, the attorneys said, but they will continue to fight for a murder charge and appropriate sentencing.

“When you fire someone, it’s an implicit admission that what they did is wrongful,” Merritt said. “The inference is hard to miss.”

Next Generation Action Network’s Dominique Alexander said Guyger’s firing was a positive step. But he said he was “not a fan of” what he perceived to be special treatment for Guyger during the investigation.

“The community cannot start to heal until this officer is held and justice is served,” Alexander said. “The first step in the process of it is making sure she’s off taxpayer dollars.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.