Man finds 4-month-old $1 million lottery ticket in wallet |

Man finds 4-month-old $1 million lottery ticket in wallet

Chris Pastrick
Stock images
A Connecticut man was cleaning out his wallet when he happened to find an old Powerball ticket — one he bought four months earlier.

It’s said a woman’s purse contains a treasure trove of stuff. But sometimes a man’s wallet can hold $1 million.

A Connecticut man was cleaning out his wallet when he happened to find an old Powerball ticket — one he bought four months earlier.

Charles Dudley of Redding, Conn., decided to check over the numbers on the Connecticut Lottery site and found it was a winner.

Lucky thing he found it: In 23 days, the deadline to claim the May 2 $1,000,000 prize would have expired.

“I had stopped for ice cream at the (Georgetown) Shell station that day,” Dudley told Lottery officials. “While I was there, I got a Powerball Quick Pick, put it in my wallet, and then forgot about it.”

After find the ticket stuck in between some old receipts, Dudley said he checked the numbers on Connecticut Lottery website. He found his ticket matched the first five numbers drawn, missing only the Powerball number.

“It didn’t feel real, though, until I checked the location of where the ticket was sold. It was where I bought my ticket,” he said.

So, guys, check through that wallet — you never know what’s in there.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at 724-226-4697, [email protected] or via Twitter @CPastrickTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.