Legislative candidates face off at tonight’s forum in O’Hara |
Fox Chapel

Legislative candidates face off at tonight’s forum in O’Hara

Tawnya Panizzi
A candidates forum will be at 6:30 p.m. Oct. 11 at O’Hara Elementary.

Residents can learn more about local legislative candidates during a forum at 6:30 p.m. tonight in O’Hara.

The forum will include two sessions, the first with Democrat Betsy Monroe and Republican Lori Mizgorski, each seeking to represent the 30th District.

Monroe, of Fox Chapel, works in the Pittsburgh healthcare industry. Mizgorski is a lifelong resident of Shaler and previously served as chief-of-staff for Rep. Hal English, who decided not to seek re-election.

The 30th District includes Fox Chapel, O’Hara, Hampton, Richland and Shaler.

The second session will see Democratic incumbent Frank Dermody and Republican Joshua Nulph, each seeking to represent the 33rd District, which includes Indiana Township.

Dermody, of Oakmont, has held office since 1990. Nulph, of Harrison, serves as the chairman of the township’s recreation board and is the youngest appointed official in the history of the township.

O’Hara Democratic Chair George Stewart said the event is a prime opportunity to meet and learn about candidates running in Nov. 6 midterm election.

The event is sponsored in part by the Pittsburgh League of Women Voters, Rise Up and the Fox Chapel branch of the AAUW. It will be at O’Hara Elementary School, 115 Cabin Lane.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121, ext. 2, [email protected] or via Twitter @tawnyatrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.