Pa. Labor & Industry nominee: Wolf’s big sop to Big Labor |

Pa. Labor & Industry nominee: Wolf’s big sop to Big Labor

Jerry Oleksiak

It’s hard to conceive of Democrat Gov. Tom Wolf handing Big Labor a bigger sop than his nomination of the Pennsylvania State Education Association’s president as the next head of the state Department of Labor & Industry — which the state Senate must reject.

That’s because it’s just as hard to conceive of Jerry Oleksiak, 64, going from advocacy as head of Pennsylvania’s largest teachers union to impartiality regarding organized-labor issues — or doing what’s best for taxpayers and the public as a whole — as Labor & Industry secretary. Not with PSEA’s contract demands routinely plundering taxpayers’ wallets and, as the Commonwealth Foundation notes, the PSEA “spending nearly $42 million on political activity since 2007,” including more than $1 million given to Mr. Wolf since 2013.

Worse yet, Mr. Oleksiak embodies one of Pennsylvania’s most repugnant teachers-union practices. Mr. Wolf touted “his 32 years in the classroom” but didn’t mention what Commonwealth does: Since 2007, he “hasn’t shown up for his job as a special education teacher in the Upper Merion Area School District. Instead, he’s been a ghost teacher” doing full-time PSEA work “while calling himself a teacher, accruing seniority, and amassing public pension credit.”

The Pennsylvania AFL-CIO congratulating Oleksiak on his nomination is another indication that he’s the wrong pick for Labor & Industry secretary. The Senate must ensure that Wolf does not succeed in handing this union fox the keys to that department’s henhouse.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.