‘Gun control’: Chicago’s lesson |

‘Gun control’: Chicago’s lesson

In Chicago, where gun homicides are outpacing last year’s shootings, the continuous clamor for more gun control falls flat in one of the most controlled cities in the nation.

At last count, there have been more than 2,700 shootings in Chicago, resulting in at least 440 deaths — an increase of approximately 400 shootings over the same period last year, based on figures compiled by the Chicago Tribune.

So naturally President Obama and like-minded liberals everywhere are stamping their feet for more restrictions when existing measures are ineffectual.

Consider, for example, Cook County’s “violence tax” at gun stores. One year after the April 2013 levy went into effect on each gun and bullet sold, the Chicago Trib reported 434 deaths, an increase of 19 deaths over 2013, writes AWR Hawkins for Breitbart.

Yet Seattle went ahead an adopted a similar tax this year.

And while Mr. Obama, Hillary Clinton and other gun grabbers insist on more gun laws, they turn a collective blind eye to beefing up enforcement of existing laws, says NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre. In Chicago, in particular, most criminals convicted of gun crimes serve less than half their sentences, according to a Washington Examiner report.

The reality is gangbangers and desperate criminals don’t obey gun laws — in Chicago or anywhere else.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.